Definition: And the same day Pilate and Herod were made friends together: for before they were at enmity between themselves.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from Luke 23:12. It's a really interesting and slightly surprising part of the story after Jesus was crucified. Here’s what it means in simpler terms: Basically, it says that after Jesus’ death, the Roman authorities (Pilate and Herod) started forming an alliance – a close relationship – with each other. Let’s unpack that a bit: “And the same day…” : This tells us this happened right after Jesus’ death. It wasn't a gradual thing; it was a rapid shift. “…Pilate and Herod were made friends together…” : Pilate was the Roman governor of Judea, and Herod was the ruler of the region around Jerusalem. They were both powerful figures in Roman rule at this time. “For before they were at enmity between themselves.” : This is the key part! “Enmity” means a bitter quarrel or disagreement. Before Jesus’ death, these two men had been locked in a long-standing conflict – a battle of wills over who was more powerful and who should rule. They were constantly trying to undermine each other. So, what does this tell us about the situation? It suggests that after Jesus’s death, the Roman authorities weren't just reacting to the news of his crucifixion; they were actively working together against him. Why is this significant? It shows how deeply intertwined the Roman government and the religious leaders (like Pilate and Herod) were during a time of political upheaval. It suggests a deliberate effort to control events and potentially, to use Jesus as a pawn in their own power games. Important Note: This verse is often interpreted as a sign of a growing lack of respect for Jesus and a willingness to prioritize the interests of Rome over those of Jewish people. It’s a complex part of the story that raises questions about leadership, power, and faith during this tumultuous period. --- Do you want me to: Explain another verse? Discuss the context of this passage in more detail? Explore what this might mean for our understanding of Roman rule at the time?